|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
more in April 8, 2010 April 8, 2010 April 8, 2010 April 8, 2010
|
|
Feb 04 2010
Pawtucket Zoning Board repeals sexual education block
by Katie Lindstedt
On Monday, February 1, certified sexologist Megan Andelloux exited the Pawtucket City Hall, victorious in the final episode of a battle that began last September when the city’s zoning board prevented her from opening the Center for Sexual Pleasure and Health. The following day, on February 2, Andelloux opened the nonprofit adult sexual education center—furnished since September—which she describes as “your grandmother’s living room…just with a lot of sex stuff around.” The center will feature drop-in hours, workshops, and an internship program for those interested in the fields of sexual education and advocacy. No School In Session But on September 15, a Pawtucket policeman called Andelloux and ordered her to cancel the center’s grand opening on the basis of zoning concerns. A zoning official informed Andelloux that the area was zoned for residential and commercial use only—not for educational activities. On November 30, Andelloux appeared before the zoning appeals board. The following Monday, the board upheld the initial decision. Opposition Politics At a state legislative hearing in June, Andelloux spoke against the indoor prostitution ban. She expressed concerns that the ban would criminalize the actions of sexual trafficking victims and deter them from interacting with police. Andelloux “fundamentally [believes] that people should have the right to do with their bodies what they want.” She said, “There are different reasons why people go into sex work; some are good, some are bad. [But] when you drive something underground it becomes worse.” After the hearing, University of Rhode Island professor and anti-trafficking activist Donna Hughes wrote an editorial in The Providence Journal, calling the hearing “a sordid circus, with pimps and prostitutes coming forward to oppose the legislation.” Hughes referred to Andelloux as a “tattooed woman, calling herself a ‘sexologist’ and ‘sex educator,’ [who] spoke against the bill.” What’s in a name? “The title freaked everybody out,” Vitali told Women’s eNews. “The ‘sexual pleasure’ end of the title flipped a few people on their heads. They didn’t know what she was talking about. They assumed it was a strip club or something.” Throughout her career, Andelloux, who holds certifications from the American Association of Sexuality Educators, Counselors and Therapists and the American College of Sexologists, has emphasized pleasure. On her official website, Andelloux writes, “Why do I do the work that I do? Too often, the views on sexuality (medical and pleasure) distance themselves from one another. The medical world frequently turns its back on the pleasurable aspects of sex, and the thrill seekers are not interested in learning the hows and whys of what makes the body work the way that it does.” “I absolutely believe that pleasure is a large component in terms of health,” she said, citing a recent study that showed individuals who use sex toys are more likely to get tested for STDs and pap smears. Andelloux also questioned the relationship between her own gender and the looming controversy. “People have made comments that if a man was trying to open up the center, no one would have batted an eye. I’m sure it’s true.” A Question of Rights In a letter to Pawtucket Mayor James E. Doyle, the ACLU claimed that city officials “appear to have reacted to this misinformation reflexively, and inappropriately,” despite Travers’ assertion that the issue was purely a question of zoning. “We argued that the city denied the permit based on a pretext, because there was no educational zone in the city and there were other tenants in the building engaged in educational activities,” Brown said. Brown claimed that Andelloux’s case is an infringement of free speech. “Miss Andelloux wants to run a facility that will provide information to the public. It appears to us that the city was trying to prevent her from opening her center because of the type of speech she wanted to engage in.” After the ACLU’s involvement, the city began to crack down on other nonprofits and businesses in violation of the zoning code. The Blackstone Chess center, another tenant of the Grant Building, received a summons. In an email, David Harris, owner of Blackstone Chess, called the zoning code “a convenient tool to use for discriminatory practices.” He wrote, “In my brief research to defend against a summons issued to the Blackstone Chess Center, I discovered that the exact interpretation of the code used to stop the Center for Sexual Pleasure and Health could be applied to dozens of downtown locations.” Another Grant tenant, Jason Hogue, wrote in an email, “[This] has shed light on glaring zoning problems in the City that will need to be addressed if they want more development and business downtown.” * * * Megan Andelloux’s struggle to open the Center for Sexual Health and Pleasure marks the final legislative saga in a year that was ripe with changes in Rhode Island’s regulation of sexuality. In 2009, Rhode Island criminalized both indoor prostitution and underage stripping, the prior statuses of which rendered the state an exception with regard to sexuality. As Andelloux rejoices in the fact that “Pawtucket is on board for people having access to information,” memories of her struggle will continue to complicate the state of sexuality in Rhode Island, one female orgasm workshop at a time. _______________________________________________________ |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||